Home
Create Account
Introduction
About the Congress
Words of Welcome
ISOCARP President
ISOCARP Secretary General
Minister of Municipality and Environment
General Rapporteur
Congress Team
Committees
Congress Committee
Local Organising Committee
ISOCARP Secretariat
Practical information
Congress Venue
Health and Safety
Exploring Doha
Accommodation
Visa
Programme
Tracks
Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Detailed programme
Workshops
Technical Tours
Special Sessions
Women in Planning
Virtual Sessions
Zoom-Presenters
Zoom-Attendees
Zoom-Moderators
Presentation and Recording Guidelines
Speakers
Brochure
Proceedings
Congress Recap
Feedback Survey
Submission
Submit your paper
Submit an Abstract
Submission Guidelines
Submit your presentation file
Registration
Fees
Tickets
Sponsorship
Sponsors
About ISOCARP
ISOCARP Website
Join ISOCARP
Contact
YPP Workshop
Application Form for YPP 2021 Participants
Application Form for YPP 2021 Coordinators
More
Gallery
FAQs
Papers
Login
57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress in Doha, Qatar
57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress in Doha, Qatar
Login
Toggle navigation
Home
Create Account
Introduction
About the Congress
Words of Welcome
ISOCARP President
ISOCARP Secretary General
Minister of Municipality and Environment
General Rapporteur
Congress Team
Committees
Congress Committee
Local Organising Committee
ISOCARP Secretariat
Practical information
Congress Venue
Health and Safety
Exploring Doha
Accommodation
Visa
Programme
Tracks
Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Detailed programme
Workshops
Technical Tours
Special Sessions
Women in Planning
Virtual Sessions
Zoom-Presenters
Zoom-Attendees
Zoom-Moderators
Presentation and Recording Guidelines
Speakers
Brochure
Proceedings
Congress Recap
Feedback Survey
Submission
Submit your paper
Submit an Abstract
Submission Guidelines
Submit your presentation file
Registration
Fees
Tickets
Sponsorship
Sponsors
About ISOCARP
ISOCARP Website
Join ISOCARP
Contact
YPP Workshop
Application Form for YPP 2021 Participants
Application Form for YPP 2021 Coordinators
More
Gallery
FAQs
Papers
57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress in Doha, Qatar
Login
Better Buses Equity Assessment Project for New York City Department of Transportation (NYC DOT)
This submission has open access
Abstract
The New York City Department of Transportation (DOT) initiated the Better Buses Action Plan in 2019 to improve the speed of buses throughout NYC by 25 percent and increase the number of bus riders by the end of 2020. Although the COVID-19 crisis impacted these plans, NYC DOT is taking the initiative to evaluate and enhance its efforts to incorporate equity and the needs of equitable populations in its Better Buses Action Plan project selection, evaluation, and community outreach processes. NYU’s Team composed the report as a summary of best practices from other U.S. cities’ inclusion of equity, considerations provided by NYC DOT stakeholders, analysis of NYC DOT’s selected priority corridors, and suggestions for NYC DOT to improve its processes. The team conducted stakeholder outreach through the distribution of a survey as well as a roundtable discussion. Furthermore, the team created maps (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/maitri5379/viz/SocialVulnerabilityIndexandNYCDOTsBusPriorityCorridorsComparativeAnalysisforNewYorkCity/MP_Story) to visualize the intersections of NYC DOT priority bus routes with demographics by census tract and graphics to show existing disparities in transportation experiences for equity populations within New York City. The analysis and findings of this report led the team to propose the following recommendations to elevate the emphasis on equity in NYC’s Better Buses Action Plan: A. Project Selection - Give higher weight to equity measures within the project selection process. Equity considerations should not be subordinate to technical factors, professional judgment and political considerations in the project selection process. NYC DOT should implement a standardized prioritization matrix that assigns additional points to corridors with routes that serve concentrations of people of color, frontline workers, people with disabilities, and locations of low-paying jobs and jobs in essential industries. In order to ensure a substantial emphasis on serving this diverse spectrum of equity populations. - Allocate a significant portion of bus priority funds to projects that disproportionately serve equity populations. To some extent, all investments in bus priority measures will impact equity populations, as overall bus ridership skews toward equity populations. However, to further promote the inclusion of equity populations in the Better Buses Action Plan, NYC DOT should consider adopting a funding distribution system that favors projects that score highly in the equity categories of the project prioritization matrix. B. Public Engagement - Use technology to engage with riders. NYC DOT should continue integrating technology into its public outreach efforts, including through the use of social media, the OMNY system and QR codes at bus stops. These tools are increasingly accessible to the general public and should be expanded to all planned projects moving forward. A key lesson from the COVID- 19 pandemic has been that online meetings and forums can increase public engagement, especially for bus riders who may not be able to attend in-person meetings. - Establish a Transportation Equity Community Partnership Program. To better understand the needs of equity populations, NYC DOT should expand its Community Advisory Board (CAB) and Better Buses Advisory Group (BBAG) model to include local organizations who work in direct service to equity populations. C. Project Evaluation - Track and publish the results of the Better Buses projects annually. Measure changes in bus speeds, on-time performance and bunching. This information should be easily accessible to riders at bus stops and online. - Follow up with riders on implemented corridors. NYC DOT should continue its engagement with riders after implementation of bus priority projects to ensure that their needs have been met and to gain insight into future projects. - Re-evaluate the project selection criteria annually. The project selection criteria should be re-evaluated routinely in order to ensure that corridors that disproportionately serve equity populations are being selected more often.
Submission ID :
ISO492
Submission Type
Research Paper
Submission Track
1: Inclusiveness and empowerment. Al-Majlis: planning with and for communities
Full paper :
View Attachment
If the file does not load,
click here
to open/download the file.
Close
Associated Sessions
Virtual Only | Track 1 | Session 2. Urbanism & Participatory Process Towards Community Planning
Author
Co-Authors
Miss Maitri Pujara
Urban Planning Student
,
New York University
AL
Ayesha Lilaoonwala
New York University
CM
Caroline Morris
New York University
RB
Rachel Brown
New York University
WS
William Sklar
New York University
Abstracts With Same Type
Submission ID
Submission Title
Submission Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
ISO83
"BAMBOO" A GLOCAL SOLUTION
Research Paper
Dr Hiral Joshi
ISO438
A community livelihood approach to rural tourism development and heritage conservation: Tashuimo village in Zhengzhou, China
Research Paper
Yichen Jiang
ISO258
A comparative study on socio-demographic factors in influencing metropolitan cities development in Indonesia (Case study: Bandung, Semarang, and Surabaya)
Research Paper
Rose Fatmadewi
ISO555
A Comparative Study on the Fitness to the Aged between Traditional Residential Communities and Modern High-rise Communities Based on the Analysis of Environment-Behavior Coupling Degree ——Take Suzhou as an example
Research Paper
Zihan YANG
ISO71
A Composite Model of Urban Renewal of Old Industrial Area: Case Study of Fashion Town in Xiuzhou New District of Jiaxing
Research Paper
Ms Jia Zhou
ISO383
A comprehensive assessment of urban vulnerability in Chongqing
Research Paper
Yu Cheng
ISO399
A Critical Review Of The GoGeorge BRT System: Examining The ‘Precarious Success’ Of The Phase 1 Of The Go George BRT System; Based On A Tourist Perception
Research Paper
Selaelo Kganakga
ISO138
A Framework for Constructing Biophilic Urban Nature——Based on the Analysis of Biophilic Aesthetics Cognition and Its Landscape Space Carriers
Research Paper
Dr Yanhong MA
ISO535
A GIS BASED SINKHOLE SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT IN EKURHULENI: A COMPARISON BETWEEN FREQUENCY RATIO WITH MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE
Research Paper
Ms Baleseng T. Mokoena
View All Abstracts
322
visits
Forgot your Password?